Issue 171 - June 2017
In the fall of 2016, the Chicago Cubs ended a 108 year drought to win the World Series. Television ratings soared by 50% as baseball fans everywhere were caught up in this dramatic and engaging story.
In their World's Greatest Leaders rankings, Fortune magazine ranked Cubs president, Theo Epstein, as #1 leader for orchestrating this turnaround. In his book, The Cubs Way: The Zen of Building the Best Team in Baseball and Breaking the Curse, Sports Illustrated senior baseball writer, Tom Verducci chronicles the five-year rebuilding plan Epstein used to win the World Series. The center of his approach was "a deeper understanding of important human qualities among his players -- the character, discipline, and chemistry that turn skilled athletes into leaders -- enabled Epstein to engineer one of the most remarkable turnarounds in sports."
Epstein saw how a Moneyball approach steeped in data and analytics succeeded and then collapsed into toxic infighting when he was with the Boston Red Sox. When he joined the Cubs, Epstein asked his scouts to look deep into each prospective player's character. He demanded pages of detailed character reports from interviews with just about everyone who knew the player. He supplemented this with analytics and statistics to find, and build the team around, players with the best balance.
Verducci observed, "they never stopped searching to find edges, but they made a fundamental decision early after coming to Chicago that the one edge they could exploit was found in a very old-school resource: people." Said Epstein, " If we can't find the next technological breakthrough, well, maybe we can be better than anyone else with how we treat our players and how we connect with players and the relationships we develop and how we put them in positions to succeed."
Over 2,000 years ago in ancient Rome, Cicero, pointed out "it is not by muscle, speed, or physical dexterity that great things are achieved, but by reflection, force of character, and judgment." Some things -- like fundamental human values -- never change.
This issue looks at a few core character elements of outstanding leaders. A Chinese Buddhist text tells us, "from intention springs the deed, from the deed springs the habits. From the habits grow the character, from character develops destiny." What we repeatedly do and practice becomes our leadership habits that form our character.
And the leaders of an organization form a collective character. This ripples out to become the organization's culture.
Aesop, the ancient Greek fabulist and storyteller observed, "After all is said and done, more is said than done."
Culture change is a perfect example. Many leaders proclaim culture change is a key strategic objective. And for good reason. Culture's been well proven as a critical "soft" factor that produces hard results.
Signs of a low-performing culture include declining engagement levels, rising absenteeism, a high "eye roll factor" for vision, mission, and values, higher turnover, declining customer satisfaction, resistance to change, low trust and teamwork, decline in quality and rise in errors, and poor safety performance.
But decades of studies continue to consistently show that up to 70% of culture change efforts fail. Despite all that's said about culture change, not much is being done in most organizations.
We first began helping organizations with culture change in the early eighties. Over the years, we've seen major transformations where lots was done, and too many efforts where lots was said, but little was done.
Our earlier work was documented in two books, Firing on All Cylinders: The Service/Quality System for High-Powered Corporate Performance and Pathways to Performance: A Guide to Transforming Yourself, Your Team, and Your Organization. Over the past dozen years, we've boiled much of this research and experience down to five key steps:
Visioning a high performance culture without effective action is hallucination. Talk without strong follow through perpetuates the delusion. As American naturalist, poet, and essayist, Henry David Thoreau said, "If you build castles in the air, your work need not be lost: That is where they should be built. Now put foundations under them."
Operating inside the centralized versus decentralized paradox and finding the right balance has been a perpetual conundrum for many organizations. Deciding which model to use is often a values issue centered on issues of control, trust, and autonomy.
We're working with a high growth international resources company acquiring and adding new sites and divisions across the globe. Their new CEO is leading a major culture shift. Part of that transformation is moving to a decentralized model with head office functions serving the local business units.
A strategy retreat of these key leaders was set up to agree on the company's evolving "decentralized model." A key starting point was getting agreement on the roles and responsibilities of the local business units and the roles and responsibilities of each corporate function in providing local service and support as well as corporate governance. To prepare for these discussions and move the corporate leaders toward serving the local business units, functional leaders needed perceptions and feedback on their function's effectiveness along with current and expected services.
Albert Einstein once said, "If I had an hour to solve a problem and my life depended on the solution, I would spend the first 55 minutes determining the proper question to ask, for once I knew the proper question, I could solve the problem in less than five minutes." In preparing for a strategy retreat with corporate function and local business leaders an assessment survey was developed.
Time and effort was invested in developing assessment questions that best framed the issues/opportunities and prepared everyone for the planning discussions. This survey was designed for learning and development only. It wasn't being used to measure performance or hold leaders accountable. Each local business unit rated each corporate function. Each functional leader also rated each corporate function including their own.
Their ratings were confidentially sent to us and only we saw the ratings and comments. We tallied the ratings and provided corporate functional leaders with a feedback summary along with personal one-on-one coaching. The focus was on helping corporate leaders prepare a development plan on how their function could best serve and support the local business units.
In conjunction with the confidential ratings each local business unit provided for each corporate function, they were also asked these questions for each function:
If you're leading a support function like HR, IT, engineering, accounting, procurement, safety, training/OD, etc. you might want to use a variation of these questions. You could have a neutral third party consolidate and feedback the responses or use an anonymous reporting service like SurveyMonkey.
The May-June issue of Harvard Business Review reports on an extensive 10-year study of "What Sets Successful CEOs Apart." 14 researchers led by professors Steven N. Kaplan at the University of Chicago and Morten Serensen of Copenhagen Business School, drew from a database of assessments of 17,000 C-suite executives including more than 2,000 CEOs. The detailed assessments of every executive included performance appraisals, information on patterns of behavior, decisions, and business results with every executive. Some of this was supplemented with personal interviews with business associates.
This is a very comprehensive study that's widely applicable to any C-suite leader or upcoming managers aspiring to senior leadership positions. Among results challenging common stereotypes was that introverts tended to slightly surpass extroverts and almost all leaders had made major mistakes. 45% of the CEO candidates "having at least one major career blowup that ended a job or was extremely costly to the business."
Four behaviors emerged as differentiating skill sets. "Roughly half the strong candidates (who earned an A overall on a scale of A, B, or C) had distinguished themselves in more than one of the four essential behaviors."
This research doesn't describe outstanding leaders as having supernatural powers across all four skill sets. One or two areas were towering strengths that elevated their effectiveness to extraordinary levels. If one of these four skills are very weak, that can be a leadership flaw that drags everything down and is fatal to effectiveness. But most leaders don't have fatal flaws, just weaker areas. The pathway to higher performance isn't through improving weaknesses. Pre/post leadership assessments show that "building leadership strengths is 2 – 3 times more effective than fixing weaknesses".
So which of these skills could you turn into your super power? Which one is among your greatest strengths? Which one would have the most impact on your current or aspired role? And which skill are you most passionate about developing? Where your answer to those three questions intersect is where you'll find your leadership development sweet spot and route to higher performance.
Can a leader be highly effective (increase productivity, profitability, service/quality levels, boost safety, etc.) without being liked? Less effective leaders often think so. They might declare "it's not a popularity contest, I don't care if people like me; my job is to get results."
Unlikable leaders get results alright -- poor and unlikable results. Zenger Folkman's study of 360 assessments on over 50,000 leaders showed that the most likable leaders, who also demanded high standards, strength goals, and continual improvement, produced results almost 9 times higher than the most unlikable leaders.
So what does it take to become a more likable -- and more effective -- leader? Zenger Folkman looked at 360 assessment data from more than 51,000 leaders to identify seven key actions that substantially increase likability scores:
Last month, Jack Zenger and Joe Folkman delivered a 45 minute webinar, The Unlikable Leader: 7 Ways to Improve Employee/Boss Relationships with practical developmental suggestions for each of the seven key actions. They also covered:
Click here to watch the archived webinar.
Contrary to what some leaders believe, it's nearly impossible to become an outstanding leader without being likable. Less likable (and less effective) leaders won't like to hear that.
View this webinar to learn the 7 key actions that our research shows will substantially increase your likability score!
This section summarizes last month's LinkedIn Updates and Twitter Tweets about online articles or blog posts that I've flagged as worth reading. These are usually posted on weekends when I am doing much of my reading for research, learning, or leisure. You can follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/JimClemmer
My original tweet commenting on the article follows each title and descriptor from the original source:
Practical development tips drawn from performance evaluations of 7,000 individual contributors and 5,000 managers.
An excellent summary of the vital "soft skills" of leading ourselves and others that produce hard results.
Do you believe a leader's role is to give corrective feedback and assume positive feedback isn't needed/useful?
Research with over 50,000 leaders shows a very strong correlation between effective leaders and likability.
The items in each month's issue of The Leader Letter are first published in my weekly blog during the previous month.
If you read each blog post (or issue of The Leader Letter) as it's published over twelve months you'll have read the equivalent of a leadership book. And you'll pick up a few practical leadership tips that help you use time more strategically and tame your E-Beast!
I am always delighted to hear from readers of The Leader Letter with feedback, reflections, suggestions, or differing points of view. Nobody is ever identified in The Leader Letter without their permission. I am also happy to explore customized, in-house adaptations of any of my material for your team or organization. Drop me an e-mail at Jim.Clemmer@ ClemmerGroup.com or connect with me on LinkedIn, Twitter, FaceBook, or my blog!
May the Force (of strengths) be with you!
In this Issue:
Please forward this newsletter to colleagues, Clients, or associates you think might be interested -- or on a 'need-to-grow' basis.
Did you receive this newsletter from someone else?
©2017 Jim Clemmer and The CLEMMER Group